Stylin’ Saturday

IMG_6094 Yes, I got my hair cut today. No, you’re not going to see a picture just yet. Right now, frankly, my hair looks terrible, but that’s because of the styling–I think the cut is going to be fine. My hair never looks good the day of a cut, and by the time the stylist has finished cutting and adds some gel or whatever kind of styling product, it’s really far too late for it to absorb properly into my hair, and just weighs it down. I won’t really know until tomorrow, or even Monday, how good a cut this is, but I think it’s going to be fine. Meanwhile, I took a picture from the chair while she was over rinsing out some highlights on another client. I must say, this is the first salon I’ve ever been to that had crystal chandeliers. Very nice “feel” to this salon–stylish without being too “edgy,” like that salon in August that I really didn’t like.

IMG_6101 After the haircut, Mom and I stopped at Nonna’s to look at their button collection. They don’t have a large collection, but since we were parked right across the street, it seemed silly not to at least stop in and look. I’m glad we did, too, because I like this one. It’s mostly gray, but with a hint of blue, and it looks great on the sweater. Since this pattern only uses one, big button, it needs to be a good one, and I like this one! That doesn’t mean I couldn’t possibly find something better, but at least it’s here and ready to go and what more do you need from a button?

IMG_6108 I am concerned about one thing, though. The pattern states, for the “ribbing” (which is actually garter stitch and would usually be called front bands or button bands) to cast on 79 stitches and knit 6 rows. Which I did. Except . . . the picture of the actual sweater shows that front band being a lot wider . . . it looks like there are at least 8 garter ridges there, under the button. So, I’m wondering if it was a typo and should have read 16 rows rather than 6. And, anyway, I think that’s what I’m going to do, any how–I like that wide front band.

But then, also, the pattern has you knit the band, ending with a few rows in a contrasting color that will be removed after the band has been sewn on . . . but what if I just picked up the stitches along the front? Instead of doing it separately? Although, part of the point would be that the transition from front to band would be seamless, and picking up the stitches clearly would make a seam. I’m not sure…. I’m also not sure I love the idea of a snap, either. The pattern calls for the sweater to be closed by a single snap, with the button sewn on just for show … I’m playing with the idea of making it a real button band instead … There are only a couple of these completed on Ravelry (link here, if you belong to Ravelry), so it’s hard to get other opinions on this. What do you folks think?

Edited to add: I just heard back from Yarnholic on Ravelry (one of the two other people to finish this) and she worked off of the French pattern and it said “19 rows / 6 cm” . . . so obviously my translation took the “6″ from the width and the word “rows” and made up something new (grin). She also picked up her band stitches along the fronts AND did button holes rather than a snap. (I say holes-plural because she decided she didn’t like the original placement and moved it, having to redo the entire band in the process.) Meanwhile, tonight, I finished the collar, sewed the shoulder seams and set in the sleeves, leaving the sleeve seams and side seams still to go . . . and, obviously, reknitting the button bands…. Okay–back to the original post…

IMG_6095 My last Spunky Eclectic fiber of the month package arrived today. “Snow Squall,” in Icelandic Wool. I love the blue/green/gray combination and, I must say, it coordinated beautifully with the blue/gray outfit I’m wearing. As did the couch and throw pillows in the waiting area at the Salon. You know, it’s SO important to be color-coordinated.

Now, of course, I’ve mentioned the Martha’s Vineyard Fiber Farm CSA a number of times, but today there’s a new twist. Mom belongs to a group of die-hard Carly Simon fans (Carly, of course, lives on MV), and she mentioned the MVFF on her blog the other day, and one of her fellow Carly fans was so moved by the idea of something special from Marthas Vineyard that he bought one of the Fall shares. Even though he doesn’t spin. Or knit. That’s devotion for you! He said in the e-mail he sent Mom, ” I’m a nut. And no, I haven’t a clue what I am going to do with my share (LOL)… any suggestions??” What do you think, folks? Got any ideas for him? He lives out in California somewhere, so it’s not like we’re exactly neighbors to be able to help him out. He has a couple of friends who knit, though, so that’s something, but . . . what would you suggest?

Thanks for all the compliments on yesterday’s Eye-Candy Friday. It really IS a gorgeous quilt, isn’t it? I just wish I could claim it as my own work, but that’s just not practical (or honest). I CAN make a quilt, though. Several, even, see?

10 Responses to “Stylin’ Saturday”

  1. I tried to count those garter rows… I get 9 ridges, so 18 rows, right? I do like the wider band versus narrower. I’d say if the seam doesn’t bother you, go for the pick up. Just watch that you don’t pick up the same # as you would have cast on. And I agree with you about a real button hole. Maybe reinforced because it’s a big button. Maybe because it IS a big button they did the snap (a magnetic snap might be interesting)… so the button won’t stretch out the buttonhole. The ravelry pics looked like they placed the button lower than the pattern.

  2. The pattern says something to the effect of stitching the “ribbing” to the fronts so that it completes a garter ridge . . . I’m not entirely sure how that’s supposed to happen when one is knit in one direction and the other in the opposite, but that’s what it says! But that’s why I could conceive that the instructions should say 16 instead of 6 . . . just missing the “1.” But also, I don’t really see how seaming the “live” stitches to the finished edge would really be any different than picking them up there in the first place, in terms of bulk.

    One of the two complete ones on Ravelry did have the button lower. That’s actually the other, tricky part to turning this into “real” button bands . . . how do I decide exactly where to put that buttonhole! (grin)

  3. Hmm. Button placement is going to be really tricky - too low and it’s going to gape, too high and it’s going to stretch. Maybe that’s why they didn’t use an actual button hole? Gives them some placement flexibility.

  4. Chris has a point about the button placement. Maybe it was a typo and they meant 6 garter ridges, but it does look like it’s at least 8. Anyone who has knit it on Ravelry able to help out? It’s cute.

    Sounds like you got a good haircut! Hopefully.

  5. good luck on the haircut! Cute button!

  6. Aren’t we supposed to come out of the salon feeling BETTER? I have the same problem — she makes my top and my bangs REALLY FLAT, and adds so much goop it’s ridiculous. It’s always fine when I do it myself, but what is up with that?

  7. I can more or less count on one hand the number of times I’ve walked out of a salon happy with the way my hair looked right THEN. But, ultimately, it’s the cut that matters. I’d rather have my hair look ridiculous the day of a cut but good for all the rest of the time than to LOVE the way the stylist does it and spend all the rest of my time miserable because I can’t reproduce it. (grin)

  8. I tell my hairdresser not to put anything in when she’s done then go home and finish it myself. I hope you’re happy with your hair. Love you!

  9. The button you purchased is very cool. I personally would do an actual buttonhole. I think if the snap isn’t strong enough it would constantly pop open. I like the feeling of security with my cardigans!

  10. That sure doesn’t look like 6 rows. Everything Yarnaholic said makes total sense to me. I always think my hair looks weird when I leave the salon. All the gels and the way the cut is styled freaks me out sometimes. I haven’t checked your more recent posts to see how it all came out.

Discussion Area - Leave a Comment